1
S. Wang, Y. Liu, Q. Fan, A. Zhou, L. Fan, and Y. Mu. (2016). Removal of Hg(II) from aqueous solution using sodium humate as heavy metal capturing agent. Water Sci. Technol., vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 2946–2957, doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.466.
2
H. C. Vu, A. D. Dwivedi, T. T. Le, S. H. Seo, E. J. Kim, and Y. S. Chang. (2017). Magnetite graphene oxide encapsulated in alginate beads for enhanced adsorption of Cr(VI) and As(V) from aqueous solutions: Role of crosslinking metal cations in pH control. Chem. Eng. J., doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.058.
3
N. Dave, M. Y. Chan, P. J. J. Huang, B. D. Smith, and J. Liu. (2010). Regenerable DNA-functionalized hydrogels for ultrasensitive, instrument-free mercury(II) detection and removal in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 132, no. 36, pp. 12668–12673, doi: 10.1021/ja106098j.
4
J. G. Yu et al. (2016). Removal of mercury by adsorption: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5056–5076, doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5880-x.
5
F. S. Awad, K. M. AbouZied, W. M. Abou El-Maaty, A. M. El-Wakil, and M. Samy El-Shall. (2020). Effective removal of mercury(II) from aqueous solutions by chemically modified graphene oxide nanosheets. Arab. J. Chem., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 2659–2670, doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.06.018.
6
X. F. Xiao, N. Yang, Z. L. Wang, and Y. Q. Huang. (2019). Determination of trace mercury(II) in wastewater using on-line flow injection spectrophotometry coupled with supported liquid membrane enrichment. Anal. Methods, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 582–586, doi: 10.1039/c5ay02725j.
7
Y. Zhang et al. (2019). Appraisal of Cu(ii) adsorption by graphene oxide and its modelling: Via artificial neural network. RSC Adv., vol. 9, no. 52, pp. 30240–30248, doi: 10.1039/c9ra06079k.
8
L. Zhao, C. Li, X. Zhang, G. Zeng, J. Zhang, and Y. Xie. (2020). A review on oxidation of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas with selective catalytic reduction catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 3459–3472, doi: 10.1039/c5cy00219b.
9
A. Oehmen, D. Vergel, J. Fradinho, M. A. M. Reis, J. G. Crespo, and S. Velizarov. (2019). Mercury removal from water streams through the ion exchange membrane bioreactor concept. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 264, pp. 65–70, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.067.
10
C. Tunsu and B. Wickman. (2018). Effective removal of mercury from aqueous streams via electrochemical alloy formation on platinum. Nat. Commun., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07300-z.
11
K. C. Khulbe and T. Matsuura. (2018). Removal of heavy metals and pollutants by membrane adsorption techniques. Appl. Water Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, doi: 10.1007/s13201-018-0661-6.
12
G. Z. Kyzas, E. A. Deliyanni, and K. A. Matis. (2020). Graphene oxide and its application as an adsorbent for wastewater treatment. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 196–205, doi: 10.1002/jctb.4220.
13
F. Fu and Q. Wang. (2019). Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manage., vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 407–418, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011.
14
B. Guezzen and M. Amine Didi. (2018). Removal and Analysis of Mercury (II) From Aqueous Solution by Ionic Liquids. J. Anal. Bioanal. Tech., vol. 07, no. 03, doi: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000317.
15
F. Di Natale, A. Erto, A. Lancia, and D. Musmarra. (2019). Mercury adsorption on granular activated carbon in aqueous solutions containing nitrates and chlorides. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 192, no. 3, pp. 1842–1850, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.021.
16
Y. S. Shen, S. L. Wang, Y. M. Tzou, Y. Y. Yan, and W. H. Kuan. (2019). Removal of hexavalent Cr by coconut coir and derived chars : The effect of surface functionality. Bioresour. Technol., doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.096.
17
S. Kushwaha, S. Sodaye, and P. Padmaja Sudhakar. (2018). Adsorption of Hg(II) from aqueous solution onto Borassus Flabeliffer: Equilibrium and kinetic studies. Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 12, no. 1–3, pp. 100–107, doi: 10.5004/dwt.2009.946.
18
S. L. R. K. Kanamarlapudi, V. K. Chintalpudi, and S. Muddada. (2018). Application of Biosorption for Removal of Heavy Metals from Wastewater. Biosorption, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.77315.
19
I. Lestari. (2019). Biosorption of Zn (II) Metal Ion by Ca-Alginate Immobilized Durian (Durio Zibethinus) Seed. J. Chem. Nat. Resour., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 60–68, doi: 10.32734/jcnar.v1i2.1254.
20
M. Y. Arica, G. Bayramoǧlu, M. Yilmaz, S. Bektaş, and Ö. Genç. (2018). Biosorption of Hg2+, Cd2+, and Zn2+ by Ca-alginate and immobilized wood-rotting fungus Funalia trogii. J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 109, no. 1–3, pp. 191–199, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.017.
21
S. Babel and T. A. Kurniawan. (2018). Cr(VI) removal from synthetic wastewater using coconut shell charcoal and commercial activated carbon modified with oxidizing agents and/or chitosan. Chemosphere, doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.001.
22
Y. L. Lai, M. Thirumavalavan, and J. F. Lee. (2020). Effective adsorption of heavy metal ions (Cu2+, Pb2+, Zn2+) from aqueous solution by immobilization of adsorbents on Ca-alginate beads. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 697–705, doi: 10.1080/02772240903057382.
23
F. J. Alguacil and F. A. López. (2020). Adsorption Processing for the Removal of Toxic Hg(II) from Liquid Effluents: Advances in the 2019 Year. Metals (Basel)., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 412, doi: 10.3390/met10030412.
24
D. Y. Lestari and E. W. Laksono. (2020). Kinetics and thermodynamics studies of copper(II) adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from salacca zalacca peel. Molekul, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 63–72, doi: 10.20884/1.jm.2020.15.2.530.
25
A. PetroviÄ and M. SimoniÄ. (2019). Removal of heavy metal ions from drinking water by alginate-immobilised Chlorella sorokiniana. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1761–1780, doi: 10.1007/s13762-016-1015-2.
26
P. S. Ghosal and A. K. Gupta. (2018). Determination of thermodynamic parameters from Langmuir isotherm constant-revisited. J. Mol. Liq., vol. 225, pp. 137–146, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.058.
27
H. P. Chao and C. C. Chang. (2020). Adsorption of copper(II), cadmium(II), nickel(II) and lead(II) from aqueous solution using biosorbents. Adsorption, vol. 18, no. 5–6, pp. 395–401, doi: 10.1007/s10450-012-9418-y.