Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 14, 2021
Accepted
May 19, 2021
Published
Jun 30, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 148 Download : 59

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the optimum condition of hydrogen gas produced through the electrolysis process of dry cell  generators using RSM progran. To produce hydrogen gas is done through the method of water electrolysis by decomposing the molecule H2O into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas with the help of direct electric current. Hydrogen gas productivity by electrolysis method applied to DC generators using 4/4 plate electodes (Cu/Al) as cathodes and NaNO3 solutions as electrolytes. The current and voltage used in this electrolysis process is 0.6 ampere and 2 volts for 1 hour. The concentration of hydrogen gas produced is determined using the MQ-8 sensor. The optimum condition of hydrogen gas concentration obtained is at NaNO 31 M concentration and 60 minutes with hydrogen concentration produced as much as  143.393 ppm. The verification result value for hydrogen gas concentration is 144 ppm, so the program's recommended solution is good enough.

Keywords

Hydrogen Gas, ,DC Generator, Electrolysis, Optimization, RSM

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
1.
Rahmi ST, Rahmad EU, Purnamasari D, Zainul R. Electrolyte Optimization Study on Dry Cell Generator Electrolysis System for Producing Hydrogen Gas Using RSM Method (Response Surface Method). EKSAKTA [Internet]. 2023Jun.30 [cited 2024Apr.26];24(02):226-3. Available from: https://eksakta.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/eksakta/article/view/273

References

  1. Ruiz-López, Estela, Angel Caravaca, Philippe Vernoux, Fernando Dorado, and Antonio de Lucas-Consuegra. (2020). Over-faradaic hydrogen production in methanol electrolysis cells. Chemical Engineering Journal 396, 125217
  2. Kim, Junyoung, Areum Jun, Ohhun Gwon, Seonyoung Yoo, Meilin Liu, Jeeyoung Shin, Tak-Hyoung Lim, and Guntae Kim. (2018). Hybrid-solid oxide electrolysis cell: A new strategy for efficient hydrogen production. Nano Energy 44, 121-126
  3. Badan Energi Internasional , Statistik Energi Dunia Utama. 2017.http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/keyworld.2017.Final.web.pdf. [Diakses 20 Juni 2021].
  4. Cho, Si-Kyung, Myoung-Eun Lee, Wontae Lee, and Yongtae Ahn. (2019). Improved hydrogen recovery in microbial electrolysis cells using intermittent energy input." International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44, no. 4, 2253-2257.
  5. Yuzer, B., H. Selcuk, G. Chehade, M. E. Demir, and I. Dincer. (2020). Evaluation of hydrogen production via electrolysis with ion exchange membranes. Energy 190, 116420.
  6. Mostafaeipour, Ali, Mostafa Rezaei, Ali Moftakharzadeh, Mojtaba Qolipour, and Malikeh Salimi. (2019). Evaluation of hydrogen production by wind energy for agricultural and industrial sectors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44, no. 16, 7983-7995.
  7. Konferensi Para Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa DPTSN. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2017/cop23/eng/113.pdf. Draf Keputusan 1/CP23, Diakses 20 Juni 2021.
  8. Acar, Canan, and Ibrahim Dincer. (2019). Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment. Journal of cleaner production 218, 835-849.
  9. Liu, Hong, Zhiping Zhang, Huan Zhang, Duu-Jong Lee, Quanguo Zhang, Chaoyang Lu, and Chao He. (2020). Evaluation of hydrogen yield potential from Chlorella by photo-fermentation under diverse substrate concentration and enzyme loading. Bioresource technology 303, 122956.
  10. Fereidooni, Mojtaba, Ali Mostafaeipour, Vali Kalantar, and Hossein Goudarzi. (2018). A comprehensive evaluation of hydrogen production from photovoltaic power station. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, 415-423.
  11. Zghaibeh, Manaf, Paul C. Okonkwo, Ikram Ben Belgacem, Wesam Hassan Beitelmal, and Ibrahim B. Mansir. (2022). Analytical model for a techno-economic assessment of green hydrogen production in photovoltaic power station case study Salalah city-Oman. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47, no. 31, 14171-14179.
  12. Aminov, R. Z., and A. N. Bairamov. (2017). Performance evaluation of hydrogen production based on off-peak electric energy of the nuclear power plant. International journal of hydrogen energy 42, no. 34, 21617-21625.
  13. Wu, Hao, Shuxing Zhang, Xiaoxia Li, Shixue Liu, and Liang Liang. (2022). A multivariate coupled economic model study on hydrogen production by renewable energy combined with off-peak electricity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47, no. 58, 24481-24492.
  14. Garcia, Gabriel, Emmanuel Arriola, Wei-Hsin Chen, and Mark Daniel De Luna. (2021). A comprehensive review of hydrogen production from methanol thermochemical conversion for sustainability. Energy 217, 119384.
  15. Weger, Lindsey, Alberto Abánades, and Tim Butler. (2017). Methane cracking as a bridge technology to the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42, no. 1, 720-731.
  16. Kato, Shota, Yutaka Saga, Masahiro Kojima, Hiromu Fuse, Shigeki Matsunaga, Arisa Fukatsu, Mio Kondo, Shigeyuki Masaoka, and Motomu Kanai. (2017). Hybrid catalysis enabling room-temperature hydrogen gas release from N-heterocycles and tetrahydronaphthalenes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 139, no. 6, 2204-2207.
  17. Majumdar, Arun, John M. Deutch, Ravi S. Prasher, and Thomas P. Griffin. (2021). A framework for a hydrogen economy. Joule 5, no. 8, 1905-1908.
  18. Nikolaidis, Pavlos, and Andreas Poullikkas. (2017). A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 67, 597-611.
  19. Calise, Francesco, Massimo Dentice D’Accadia, Massimo Santarelli, Andrea Lanzini, and Domenico Ferrero, eds. Solar hydrogen production: processes, systems and technologies. Academic Press, 2019.
  20. Brandon, Nigel P., and Zeynep Kurban. (2017). Clean energy and the hydrogen economy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 375, no. 2098, 20160400.
  21. Dawood, Furat, Martin Anda, and G. M. Shafiullah. (2020). Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45, no. 7, 3847-3869.
  22. da Silva Veras, Tatiane, Thiago Simonato Mozer, and Aldara da Silva César. (2017). Hydrogen: trends, production and characterization of the main process worldwide. International journal of hydrogen energy 42, no. 4. 2018-2033.
  23. Wei, T. Y., K. L. Lim, Y. S. Tseng, and S. L. I. Chan. (2017). A review on the characterization of hydrogen in hydrogen storage materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79, 1122-1133.
  24. Arregi, Aitor, Maider Amutio, Gartzen Lopez, Maite Artetxe, Jon Alvarez, Javier Bilbao, and Martin Olazar. (2017). Hydrogen-rich gas production by continuous pyrolysis and in-line catalytic reforming of pine wood waste and HDPE mixtures. Energy Conversion and Management 136, 192-201.
  25. Hamad, Mohamed A., Aly M. Radwan, Dalia A. Heggo, and Tarek Moustafa. (2016). Hydrogen rich gas production from catalytic gasification of biomass. Renewable Energy 85,1290-1300.
  26. Chi, Jun, and Hongmei Yu. (2018). Water electrolysis based on renewable energy for hydrogen production." Chinese Journal of Catalysis 39, no. 3, 390-394.
  27. ezzahra Chakik, Fatima, Mohammed Kaddami, and Mohammed Mikou. (2017). Effect of operating parameters on hydrogen production by electrolysis of water. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42, no. 40, 25550-25557.
  28. Rashid, M. D., Mohammed K. Al Mesfer, Hamid Naseem, and Mohd Danish. (2015). Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: a review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high temperature water electrolysis. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology.
  29. Lamb, Krystina E., Michael D. Dolan, and Danielle F. Kennedy. (2019). Ammonia for hydrogen storage; A review of catalytic ammonia decomposition and hydrogen separation and purification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44, no. 7, 3580-3593.
  30. Aziz, Muhammad, Agung Tri Wijayanta, and Asep Bayu Dani Nandiyanto. (2020). Ammonia as effective hydrogen storage: A review on production, storage and utilization. Energies 13, no. 12, 3062.
  31. Zainul, Rahadian, and Sri Whayu Wardani. (2019). The Hydrogen Generator Performance of Sandwich Designed 4/4 Al-Cu Plates. EKSAKTA: Berkala Ilmiah Bidang MIPA 20, no. 1,100-104.
  32. Zainul, Rahadian. (2015). Photoelectrosplitting water for hydrogen production using illumination of indoor lights."Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 11, no. 7, 57-67.
  33. Myers, Raymond H., Douglas C. Montgomery, G. Geoffrey Vining, Connie M. Borror, and Scott M. Kowalski. (2004). Response surface methodology: a retrospective and literature survey. Journal of quality technology 36, no. 1, 53-77.
  34. Dean, Angela, Daniel Voss, Danel Draguljić, Angela Dean, Daniel Voss, and Danel Draguljić. (2017). Response surface methodology. Design and analysis of experiments, 565-614.
  35. Myers, Raymond H., Douglas C. Montgomery, and Christine M. Anderson-Cook. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
  36. Nugraha, Eka Firman Widya. (2016). Pengaruh Jarak Celah Elektroda Dan Ketebalan Pelat Terhadap Produktivitas Brown’s Gas Pada Electrolyzer Dry Cell. PhD diss., Universitas Brawijaya.
  37. Sari, Tria Puspa, Denny Widhiyanuriyawan, Radissa Dzaky Issafira, Wahyu Dwi Lestari, Ndaru Adyono, Wiliandi Saputro, and Ahmad Khairul Faizin. (2021) The Effect of Electrode Gap Distance on Brown's Gas. Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings, 329-334.
  38. Muthu, Viknesh Samuel Savari, Shahrul Azmir Osman, and Saliza Azlina Osman. (2022). A Review of the Effects of Plate Configurations and Electrolyte Strength on Production of Brown Gas Using Dry Cell Oxyhydrogen Generator. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 99, no. 1, 1-8.
  39. Nurmiah, Sitti, Rizal Syarief, Sukarno Sukarno, Rosmawaty Peranginangin, and Budi Nurmata. (2013). Aplikasi response surface methodology pada optimalisasi kondisi proses pengolahan alkali treated cottonii (ATC). Jurnal Pascapanen dan Bioteknologi Kelautan dan Perikanan 8, no. 1, 9-22.
  40. Karimifard, Shahab, and Mohammad Reza Alavi Moghaddam. (2018). Application of response surface methodology in physicochemical removal of dyes from wastewater: a critical review. Science of the Total Environment 640, 772-797.
  41. Abdulhameed, Ahmed Saud, AbdulKarim-Talaq Mohammad, and Ali H. Jawad. (2019). Application of response surface methodology for enhanced synthesis of chitosan tripolyphosphate/TiO2 nanocomposite and adsorption of reactive orange 16 dye. Journal of Cleaner Production 232, 43-56.
  42. Arslan, Ayla, Eylem Topkaya, Deniz Bingöl, and Sevil Veli. (2018). Removal of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate from aqueous solutions by O3/UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process: Process optimization with response surface methodology approach." Sustainable Environment Research 28, no. 2, 65-71.
  43. Chowdhury, Silvia, Faridah Yusof, Mohammad Omer Faruck, and Nadzril Sulaiman. (2016). Process optimization of silver nanoparticle synthesis using response surface methodology." Procedia engineering 148, 992-999.
  44. Ye, Wenlian, Xiaojun Wang, Yingwen Liu, and Jun Chen. (2021). Analysis and prediction of the performance of free-piston Stirling engine using response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering 188, 116557.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>