EKSAKTA: Berkala Ilmiah Bidang MIPA
Open Access

Comparison of Mangrove Biomass in Three Different Mangrove Ecosystem Locations in Maros Regency

1 Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Fisheries, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
2 Center of Climate Change Studies, Institute for Research and Community Service, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
3 Climate Change and Coastal Research Group, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
Download PDF

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the variation in mangrove biomass across three locations in Maros Regency, South Sulawesi, namely Borongkalukua, Bonto Bahari, and Ampekale. Data collection was conducted using purposive sampling design, 27 observation plots (10×10 m; n=9 per location) were established to estimate biomass through Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) and species-specific allometric equations. Five mangrove species were identified, namely Rhizophora mucronata, Rhizophora apiculata, Avicennia alba, Avicennia marina, and Sonneratia alba. The two-way ANOVA results showed that species (p = 0.0003), location (p = 0.0266), and their interaction (p = 0.0065) had significant effects on biomass. The Kruskal–Wallis test also confirmed differences in median biomass among locations (p = 0.0104). Borongkalukua exhibited the highest biomass (302.57 Mg/ha) dominated by R. mucronata and R. apiculata, followed by Ampekale (223.20 Mg/ha) dominated by R. apiculata and S. alba, while the lowest biomass was recorded in Bonto Bahari (129.44 Mg/ha), dominated by A. marina. These variations in biomass reflect differences in species’ adaptive capacity to local environmental conditions. Overall, the findings emphasize that the interaction between species and location is a key determinant of mangrove biomass productivity. 

References

1
[1] Bimrah, K., Dasgupta, R., Hashimoto, S., Saizen, I., & Dhyani, S. (2022). Ecosystem services of mangroves: A systematic review and synthesis of contemporary scientific literature. Sustainability, 14(19), 12051.
2
[2] Lee, H., Kim, H., Park, E., & Lee, B. (2025). Beyond carbon: a systematic review of multiple ecosystem services of mangroves. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 29(6), 58.
3
[3] Hülsen, S., Dee, L. E., Kropf, C. M., Meiler, S., & Bresch, D. N. (2025). Mangroves and their services are at risk from tropical cyclones and sea level rise under climate change. Communications Earth & Environment, 6(1), 262.
4
[4] Xu, C., Xue, Z., Jiang, M., Lyu, X., Zou, Y., Gao, Y., ... & Li, R. (2024). Simulating potential impacts of climate change on the habitats and carbon benefits of mangroves in China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 54, e03048.
5
[5] Stamoulis, K. A., Pittman, S. J., Delevaux, J. M., Antonopoulou, M., Carpenter, S., Zaaboul, R., ... & Mateos-Molina, D. (2025). Conserving key coastal areas for mangrove expansion and eco-tourism secures ecosystem services under sea-level rise. npj Ocean Sustainability.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

1.
Comparison of Mangrove Biomass in Three Different Mangrove Ecosystem Locations in Maros Regency. EKSAKTA [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 28 [cited 2026 Aug. 23];27(01):33-44. Available from: https://eksakta.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/eksakta/article/view/635

Most read articles by the same author(s)