Article Sidebar

Submitted
Nov 15, 2022
Accepted
Feb 20, 2023
Published
Mar 30, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 194 Download : 89

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Organic waste is mainly categorized in recent days as household waste and city garbage. To meet eco-friendly waste management, incorrect composter or conventional composting methods do not fulfilling the demands even though sometimes the composting procedure is so lengthy. To speed up the composting process, our research team has developed an aerobic composter using microorganisms, e.g., Trichoderma, Effective Microorganism 4 (EM4), and a combination of Trichoderma. Three different aerobic rolling composters (ARC) were designed to speed up the composting process during the testing stage by employing EM4. It showed a greater reduction in waste height utilizing EM4 on the 15th day (3.8%-17.9%) than the conventional one (2%). In addition, inoculation of EM4 and Trichoderma in combination with EM4 caused a 45% reduction in weight. Thus, the composter (type 3) efficiently decomposes the waste with a shorter composting period.  

Keywords

aerobic fermentation food waste microorganism composting Trichoderma

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
1.
Amelia F, Yusmaita E, Fernanda Y, Yulianis F, Rahmayani S, Islam A. Assessing the Potentiality of Aerobic Rolling Composter to Hasten Vegetable and Fruit Waste. EKSAKTA [Internet]. 2023Mar.30 [cited 2024Nov.5];24(01):92-8. Available from: https://eksakta.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/eksakta/article/view/368

References

  1. KLKH. (2022). Capaian Kinerja Pengolahan Sampah. https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/
  2. G. V. Nevárez-Moorillón, Z. A. Zakaria, L. A. Prado-Barragán, and C. N. Aguilar. (2022). Editorial: New Trends in Food Processing: Reducing Food Loss, Waste, and the Environmental Impact. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, vol. 6.
  3. H. Kumar et al. (2022). Fruit and Vegetable Peel Waste: Applications in Food and Environmental Industries BT - Fruits and Vegetable Wastes : Valorization to Bioproducts and Platform Chemicals. R. C. Ray, Ed. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 259–287.
  4. N. D. Organo, S. M. J. M. Granada, H. G. S. Pineda, J. M. Sandro, V. H. Nguyen, and M. Gummert. (2022). Publisher Correction: Assessing the potential of a Trichoderma-based compost activator to hasten the decomposition of incorporated rice straw. Sci. Rep., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1647.
  5. E. Mirwandono et al. (2018). Nutrition quality test of fermented waste vegetables by bioactivator local microorganisms (MOL) and effective microorganism (EM4). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 122.
  6. N. Miguel, A. López, S. D. Jojoa-Sierra, J. Fernández, J. Gómez, and M. P. Ormad. (2022). Physico-Chemical and Microbiological Control of the Composting Process of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: A Pilot-Scale Experience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 23.
  7. M. Ge et al. (2020). Effect of aeration rates on enzymatic activity and bacterial community succession during cattle manure composting. Bioresour. Technol., vol. 304, p. 122928.
  8. C. Liang, K. C. Das, and R. W. McClendon. (2003). The influence of temperature and moisture contents regimes on the aerobic microbial activity of a biosolids composting blend. Bioresour. Technol., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 131–137.
  9. M. S. Jain, M. Daga, and A. S. Kalamdhad. (2019). Variation in the key indicators during composting of municipal solid organic wastes. Sustain. Environ. Res., vol. 29, no. 1, p. 9.
  10. M. Papale et al. (2021). Prokaryotic Diversity of the Composting Thermophilic Phase: The Case of Ground Coffee Compost. Microorganisms, vol. 9, no. 2.
  11. T. T. K. Ho et al. (2022). Compost to improve sustainable soil cultivation and crop productivity. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., vol. 6, p. 100211.
  12. J. Yuan et al. (2016). Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Manag., vol. 56, pp. 403–410.
  13. M. S. Jain, S. Paul, and A. S. Kalamdhad. (2020). Kinetics and physics during composting of various organic wastes: Statistical approach to interpret compost application feasibility. J. Clean. Prod., vol. 255, p. 120324.
  14. P. Parihar and R. Choudhary. (2020). Influence of Organic Waste on Nutrient Composition of Compost and the Impact of Sawdust on Composting Process. TI2 - Current World Environment, no. 0973–4929.
  15. D. D. Olani, H. Sulaiman, and S. Leta. (2012). Evaluation of Composting and the Quality of Compost from the Source Separated Municipal Solid Waste. vol. 16, pp. 5–10.
  16. V. Murugesan and D. J. Amarnath. (2020). Bio-process performance, evaluation of enzyme and non-enzyme mediated composting of vegetable market complex waste. Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 19801.
  17. Y. Dewilda, R. Aziz, and R. A. Handayani. (2019). The effect of additional vegetables and fruits waste on the quality of compost of cassava chip industry solid waste on takakura composter. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 602, no. 1, p. 12060.
  18. S. Aslanzadeh, K. Kho, and I. B. B. Sitepu. (2020). An Evaluation of the Effect of Takakura and Effective Microorganisms (EM) as Bio Activators on the Final Compost Quality. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 742.
  19. Lkarimiah. (2019). Effects Of Technical Factors Towards Achieving The Thermophilic Temperature Stage In Composting Process And The Benefits Of Closed Rector System Compared To Conventional Method – A Mini Review. 2019.
  20. P. Noll, L. Lilge, R. Hausmann, and M. Henkel. (2020). Modeling and Exploiting Microbial Temperature Response. Processes, vol. 8, no. 1.
  21. A. S. Kalamdhad and A. A. Kazmi. (2009). Rotary drum composting of different organic waste mixtures. Waste Manag. Res. J. Int. Solid Wastes Public Clean. Assoc. ISWA, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 129–137.
  22. C. Sundberg et al. (2013). Effects of pH and microbial composition on odour in food waste composting. Waste Manag., vol. 33, pp. 204–211.
  23. C. Ghinea and A. Leahu. (2020). Monitoring of Fruit and Vegetable Waste Composting Process: Relationship between Microorganisms and Physico-Chemical Parameters. Processes.
  24. R. Fathurahman and A. Surjosatyo. (2022). Utilization of rice husks as a fuel for gasification – A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1034, no. 1, p. 12065.
  25. M. Singh, A. Gupta, V. Pal, R. K. Seth, A. Kulshreshtha, and S. R. Dhakate. (2022). Rice husk biomass torrefied without carrier gas: influence on physico-thermal properties as co-combusted renewable fuel. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, 2022.
  26. M. Szymańska-Chargot, M. Chylińska, K. Gdula, A. Kozioł, and A. Zdunek. (2017). Isolation and Characterization of Cellulose from Different Fruit and Vegetable Pomaces. Polymers (Basel)., vol. 9, no. 10