Main Article Content

Abstract

This article presents a review of bibliometric analysis on the topic of science learning media research. The aim of this research is to identify relevant research and the latest research on the research topic being analyzed. The method used in this research is descriptive quantitative with bibliometric data approach. Research data collection is carried out on the Google Scholar page with the help of Publish or Perish (PoP) software using the keyword "science learning media". Search is limited to the 2019-2021 range and the number of search results is limited to 100. Data analysis and visualization using VOSviewer software. The result is the number of article citations is 328 citations with an average of 164 citations/year and 3.64 citations/articles. IOPSCIENCE is the most productive publisher with the highest number of articles, which is 23 articles. Bibliometric visualization of network maps based on text-mining analysis resulted in 24 interconnected words grouped into 4 clusters and network maps based on the authors of the Co-authorsip showed that Alpusari and Hermita were the authors who had the most related with other authors in the topic of science learning media research.

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis learning media science

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Subagja S, Ardianto D, Rubini B. Analysis of Update Mapping in Science Learning Media Research: Bibliometric Analysis Based on Google Scholar Data. EKSAKTA [Internet]. 2022Sep.30 [cited 2023Jan.26];23(03):135-44. Available from: https://eksakta.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/eksakta/article/view/322

References

  1. Puspitarini YD, Hanif M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. Anatol J Educ. 4(2):53–60.
  2. Resien R, Sitompul H, Situmorang J. (2020). The Effect of Blended Learning Strategy and Creative Thinking of Students on the Results of Learning Information and Communication Technology by Controlling Initial Knowledge. Budapest Int Res Critics Linguist Educ J. 3(2):879–93.
  3. Sitorus LS, Mardianto M, Matsum H. (2020). Development of Powerpoint-Based Learning Media on Learning Aqeedah Morals. Budapest Int Res Critics Linguist Educ J. 3(2):958–64.
  4. Marpanaji E, Mahali MI, Putra RAS. (2018). Survey on How to Select and Develop Learning Media Conducted by Teacher Professional Education Participants. J Phys Conf Ser. 1140(1).
  5. Puspitarini YD, Hanif M. (2019). Using Learning Media to Increase Learning Motivation in Elementary School. 4(2):53–60.
  6. Yusuf R, Sanusi, Razali, Maimun, Putra I.(2020). Critical thinking and learning outcomes through problem based learning model based on LBK application. Int J Innov Creat Chang. 12(12):907–18.
  7. Murcia K. (2008). Teaching for scientific literacy with an interactive whiteboard. Teach Sci. 54(4):17–21.
  8. Aini CN, Habibi MW.(2020). Development of Booklet Based Science Learning Media for Junior High School. INSECTA Integr Sci Educ Teach Act J.1(2):155–67.
  9. Ikhsan J, Akhyar M, Nais MK. (2019). The effects of science-on-web learning media on junior high school students’ learning independency levels and learning outcomes. J Turkish Sci Educ.16(2):231–9.
  10. Imronah I, Parmin P. (2021). The Effectiveness of the Planetarium Android Learning Application Virtual Observatory on Solar System Material. J Innov. 2021;(37).
  11. Zhang F, Zhang H.(2021).Bibliometric analysis of research trends on acupuncture for neck pain treatment over the past 20 years [letter]. J Pain Res.14:3553–4.
  12. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 84(2):523–38.
  13. Hanief YN.(2021). Bibliometric analysis of sports studies in the “Journal Sport Area.” J Sport Area. 6(2):263–74.
  14. Waaijer CJF, Palmblad M. (2015). Bibliometric mapping: Eight decades of analytical chemistry, with special focus on the use of mass spectrometry. Anal Chem.87(9):4588–96.
  15. Garza-Reyes JA. (2015). Lean and green-a systematic review of the state of the art literature. J Clean Prod. 102:18–29.
  16. Rafika AS, Putri HY, Widiarti FD. (2015). Analisis Mesin Pencarian Google Scholar Sebagai Sumber Baru Untuk Kutipan. J CERITA. 3(2):193–205.
  17. Aulianto DR, Yusup PM, Setianti Y. (2020). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi “ Publish Or Perish ” Sebagai Alat Analisis Sitasi Pada Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Universitas Padjadjaran. B Chapter Semin Nas MACOM III "Communication Inf Beyound Boundaries, 873–80.
  18. Parmar A, Ganesh R, Mishra AK. (2019). The top 100 cited articles on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A citation analysis. Asian J Psychiat, 42:34–41.
  19. Yan K, Zou D, Yan G, Fang H, Weiss M, Rautiainen M, et al. (2021). A Bibliometric Visualization Review of the MODIS LAI/FPAR Products from 1995 to 2020. J Remote Sens, 1–20.
  20. Mercer N, Hennessy S, Warwick P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry Journal of Educational Research. Elsevier.
  21. Liu Z, Yin Y, Liu W, Dunford M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics.103(1):135–58.
  22. Nagy G. (2018). Text mining-based scientometric analysis in educational research. Eur Conf Educ 2018, 129–42.
  23. Bilik O, Damar HT, Ozdagoglu G, Ozdagoglu A, Damar M. (2020). Identifying trends, patterns, and collaborations in nursing career research: A bibliometric snapshot (1980–2017). Collegian. 27(1):40–8.